Sweeping new rules at the Pentagon -- ordered by outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta after a year of consultations with senior military officers -- require the military services to expand all positions to women -- or convince the defense secretary why those jobs should remain exclusively male.
Do you support or oppose this change? Tell us in the comments section below.
The armed services have until May 15 to submit specific plans for lifting all remaining job restrictions for women, and until January 2016 for all exemptions to be sought and changes to be put in place, according to a Huffington Post report.
Read more: Marine Corps Major Debunks Myths About Women in Combat
The changes do not require the approval of Congress, which will have 30 days to weigh in on the decision.
Tough as that is, those Marines who go through Infantry Training Regiment (ITR) (most Marines do not) are headed to be front line ground combatants. That training is severely physically punishing. Some men cannot do it. Some women will not be able to do it. But those who do make it are close quarter war fighters who only care about one thing when it comes to the persons they serve with. Can they do their job? ITR is training and testing. Any woman who passes the test has earned her place in those ranks. So, my only concern is that the standards applied to women trying to go Army or Marine infantry will be the exactly the same as those applied to men. I believe they will be. As for other combat rolls like artillery, engineers, armor, etc I have am sure most women will do well. In the infantry some men do not so well, so we
so we have to expect that some women will not. Semper Fi, Maam. Glad to have you aboard.
How is it that women making a free choice to serve in the military and being properly recognized for their service in their assignments, making "everyone as one"?